A Missile hit the Pentagon?

Videos of the Pentagon Security cameras from the History Commons

Video from far camera

Video from closer camera

Image by image comparison of security camera footage

Photo source: 9/11thology by Dmitri Khalezov, page 647.

Missiles hit the Pentagon?
Slips of the tongue from Rumsfeld & Roemer

CNN interview of Tim Roemer, 9/11 Commissioner, stating that the Pentagon was hit by a missile, 9/11/2006

"There were many times, Miles, that you were afraid. You were uh, you were worried, uh, especially when I was standing in front of the Pentagon that night seeing one of our, uh, fortresses pried open by a missile airplane."

CNN interview of Donald Rumsfeld on Dec. 24, 2004 stating the Shanksville plane was shot down

"And I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul or the people who did the bombing in Spain or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania, attacked the Pentagon, the people who cut off peoples' heads on television to intimidate, to frighten -- indeed the word terrorized is just that. Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter behavior, to make people be something other than that which they want to be."

Full transcript here

Rumsfeld talks about missile damage to "this building" (the Pentagon?) and similar (inaudible) that damaged the WTC

Official DOD transcript of Rumsfeld interview with Parade Magazine, Oct. 12, 2001:

"They [find a lot] and any number of terrorist efforts have been dissuaded, deterred or stopped by good intelligence gathering and good preventive work. It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them."

Dmitri Khalezov on 911 Pentagon attack

Photo source: 9/11thology by Dmitri Khalezov, page 646.

Stolen Soviet made granit missile that Dmitri claims hit the Pentagon.
Photo source: 9/11thology by Dmitri Khalezov, page 652.

Some excerpts from Dmitri's book 9/11thology on why it was a Soviet made granit missile and not one of our own, and more of what really happened on 9/11 from pages: 642-664
"According to some air-traffic controllers, testifying before the 9/11 Commission, and giving various interviews later, that flying object, which headed towards the Pentagon shortly before the impact, by its speed and by its maneuverability resembled nothing else than a supersonic jet-fighter. Therefore, its appearance on radar-screens was interpreted exactly as "a supersonic jet-fighter" by air-traffic controllers ..."
Quote by Danielle O'Brian: "…I noticed the aircraft. It was an unidentified plane to the southwest of Dulles, moving at a very high rate of speed … I had literally a blip and nothing more…" "… the speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that it was a military plane…" "…I was yelling … 'We've got a target headed right for the White House!' … Our supervisor picked up our line to the White House and started relaying to them information, [that] we have an unidentified very fast-moving aircraft inbound toward your vicinity, 8 miles west..." [But the "plane" continued to turn right until it had made a 360-degree maneuver.] "…We lost radar contact with that aircraft. And we waited. And we waited. And your heart is just beating out of your chest waiting to hear what's happened … and then the Washington National [Airport] controllers came over our speakers in our room and said, 'Dulles, hold all of our inbound traffic. The Pentagon's been hit.'…"

According to the abovementioned account of Ms. Danielle O’Brian, its maneuverability was that high that shortly before it set itself to the final path of attack, the object managed to execute a certain unbelievable maneuver which allowed it to completely disappear from radar screens. It had never appeared on the radar screens again and had never been heard of – until it had struck its intended target. I would like the reader to notice that such a maneuver was something pertaining to a really high-technology. To be able to disappear from the radars is a feat. Be sure, that neither "Tomahawk", nor AGM-86 missiles could ever be able to come up with such a performance. Only because of this fact alone both of them shall be automatically excluded from a list of suspected kinds of missiles ...

Both above-mentioned American missiles, which are suspected to be the instruments of the 9/11 perpetration, are made from exactly the same kind of materials as any ordinary plane. Neither of them would be capable of penetrating the Pentagon's thick walls, simply because of being too fragile for such a deep penetration ...

From all various armament available in the United States, that kind of damage to the Pentagon as shown above might have been inflicted by only one kind of projectile: some Iowa-class old main-battleship (like the USS "Missouri") would fire its main 16-inch cannon using an armor-piercing shell. Then, and only then, would the damage inflicted to the Pentagon by such a shell look like that one. Sorry to say so, but in the United States there were no other weapons capable to achieve such a penetration ...

Do you think that in our big-big world there are only American-made missiles available and nothing else? Probably, not many people paid close attention to this "peculiar", but, nevertheless, well-known fact: most of

the U.S. jet-fighters scrambled in response to the Pentagon’s "plane's crash" were oddly diverted over the Atlantic Ocean ...

I hope now it is clear to the discerning reader what exactly that odd "flying object" that struck the Pentagon during the 9/11 events was? It was nothing else than the most dreadful piece of the inheritance of the Cold War Era. A heavily armored, and deemed to be invincible, Soviet-made supersonic "Granit" missile, equipped with its usual 500 kiloton in TNT yield, thermonuclear warhead. The warhead, by the way, was enough to level the entire Washington D.C., considering that the Hiroshima bomb was merely 13 kiloton. Since the 9/11 event, perpetrators still had in their possession, 22 "Granit" missiles. To stage an attack on the Pentagon, they decided to spare one... With a broken detonator ...

This missile does not need any sophisticated equipment to be launched and can be relatively fired easily from almost any kind of launching tube – similarly to any RPG ammunition (you do not actually need to have an RPG-rifle to launch an RPG-grenade; in theory, it could be launched under various angles from virtually any kind of primitive self-made equipment). This missile has a maximum range of 625 km (388 miles). Apparently, it was fired from some innocently looking small ship taking position just outside of the U.S. territorial waters. In only a few seconds it gathered its cruise altitude, easily penetrated the U.S. airspace at the supersonic speed of 2.5 Mach, and in only about 10 minutes reached Washington D.C. The American anti-aircraft defense system was totally helpless against such a weapon. Since the Pentagon (as being the military headquarters of the Main Adversary of the former USSR) was a Priority Target No.1, it had been already pre-designated in the missile's inertial guidance system. Those rogue guys, who launched the "Granit" missile, had no need to bother entering into its guidance system the Pentagon's coordinates manually – they had been already pre-loaded.... When it approached Washington, the "Granit" executed a certain pre-designated maneuver that was especially designed to increase the missile's invincibility from any potential anti-aircraft defense fire. That was exactly that very unbelievable maneuver, which allowed it to completely disappear from the radar screens of the Dulles' air-traffic controllers. After its "disappearance" from the radars, the missile took that unbelievable "sharp descending curve", which allowed it to reach the location of the Pentagon in a remarkably short time (considering its actual cruise altitude). When the missile descended low enough to get very close to the Pentagon, it apparently executed one more bizarre pre-designated maneuver – designed to increase the missile's invincibility on the last stage of attack. This last one, I presume, left those oddly configured pink smokes visible on the infamous FBI's frames from the security camera. Immediately after executing its last maneuver, the missile descended once again – this time to a "seaskimming" altitude, decreased speed to only 1.5 Mach, and set itself to its final (direct) path of attack – over the Pentagon's lawn. It managed to throw aside a huge electric generator, that happened to be in its way, and hit the Pentagon just slightly above its "water-line" level. The "Granit", first of all, is an anti-ship missile; so its behavior is typical to anti-ship missiles – it always hits targets slightly above water-line levels ...

What about its 500 kiloton thermonuclear warhead? Luckily, it did not go off, because if it did, it would prove that a cafeteria in the middle of the Pentagon's so-called "Ground Zero Plaza" – also mockingly named a "Ground Zero Café" – had truly deserved its name. In such a case, not only the Pentagon, but the entire city of Washington would be missing on today’s maps. That is exactly why the U.S. Government was scared nearly to death, when such a thing was found unexploded in between the Pentagon's Rings "C" and "B". That is exactly why the most peculiar plane – the "Boeing E-4B" ("Advanced Airborne Command Post"), known as a "doomsday plane" (since it could be engaged only during a real nuclear war) – had been noticed by some people making circles around the White House. That is exactly why the anti-atomic doors of NORAD's mountain were closed for the first time in history ...

Why did the U.S. Government not say honestly to the public that the Pentagon had been struck by the "Granit" missile belonging to the terrorists, but, instead, resorted to the most incredible story, which blamed the Pentagon attack on the "Flight 77"? ... besides, the nuclear component of the attack, the perpetrators have further humiliated the U.S. Government by the mere fact that by the time the "Granit" had penetrated the U.S. airspace, the United States itself was in its highest alert ...

The “Granit” missile did not steal surreptitiously into sleeping America during some quiet Sunday night. It, indeed, proudly entered the sovereign U.S. airspace in broad daylight, moreover, amidst the highest possible alert. Nevertheless, proving that it was truly invincible, the missile managed to reach the very Heart of America – the White House and the Pentagon. Do you remember what the air-traffic controllers had claimed in their testimonies? That so-called “very fast-moving aircraft” had turned away from the White House just only being three miles short of reaching it, and seemed to re-direct itself onto the Pentagon in the very last moment. Why the missile did not hit the White House and hit the Pentagon, instead? Since here I do not have any 100% proof, I could only guess why ... I think, the missile was simply fired towards Washington D.C. On its flight, it reconnoitered the underlying territory; its on-board computer "understood" that it was flying above the main enemy’s city – called "Washington". Thus, it figured out the best target – the "White House" – and caused the missile to fly towards it. However, after a while, it noticed the second high-priority target – the “Pentagon”. After a little "thinking", the on-board computer "decided" that the Pentagon should have more priority than the White House. Therefore it "preferred" to change its course and re-direct the missile onto the Pentagon. This was exactly what we could observe in the actual missile's behavior: first, it flew towards the White House, then, suddenly, it decided to re-direct itself onto the Pentagon ...

A maximum of what NORAD was able to do was to ring the atomic alert – and so it did. This resulted in the Secret Service agent's quick action – they burst into Vice-President Dick Cheney's office and promptly dragged him (and also Condoleezza Rice) into the underground anti-atomic bunker under the White House. The rest of the American people were just left to wait their imminent thermonuclear incineration. That was the maximum of what they could do in a sense of the United States' protection ...

However, it is not so clear why the atomic alert was not rung to the rest of the residents of Washington D.C., but only to the "big guys" alone? I can not answer this question, because I do not know the contemporary American contingency plans in details. However, I remember that I read some old ones (not the actual "contingency plans", but the civil defense instructions to the general population on how to act in a situation of the atomic alert) and

it appeared to me that an atomic alert in the United States had to be rung for the entire population, and not only for its Government alone. At least, so it was in the old good times. Though, perhaps, now it has been changed – since the U.S. Government does no longer look like a part of the U.S. nation, but as something rather "alien" to the nation it rules and rips off.

When already humiliated by the WTC nuclear demolition, what could the poor U.S. Government do? Tell to the American public the full truth? That the United States indeed had been attacked, not just by some amateurish Arab "pilots" who transformed the "hijacked" planes into primitive weapons, but by the very hydrogen warhead, which was about 35 times the size of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima?

One could probably imagine what kind of hysteria would follow the news and what kind of consequences would result from such a "revelation of truth" to the rate of the U.S. dollar and to the U.S. economy in general ... Even if the revelation of the truth about the nuclear events in Manhattan might probably scare only the Wall Street’s lazybones, the U.S. Government still did not dare to go ahead with the truth. What would you expect in regards to missiles with half-megaton loads flying at will all around the United States? This would apparently scare the population to death… Maybe, the entire U.S. economy might have collapsed at once. Of course, the U.S. Government was quick to invent some other story – that the Pentagon was hit by the allegedly "hijacked" Flight 77, which for this reason, had been promptly "re-assigned" from the WTC to the Pentagon. Add here that

the U.S. Government (to be more precise, Dick Cheney), in panic, ordered to shoot down passenger aircraft and at least two of them – United Flight 93 and American Flight 77 – were indeed shot down ...

In reality, however, the 9/11 perpetrators did not intend to level Washington D.C. in its entirety by a halfmegaton thermonuclear explosion. Apparently, they made sure that the warhead of that missile would not go off. If they had really wanted it to explode, it would definitely explode ...

The true intention of the 9/11 perpetrators was totally different than to make another “ground zero” out of Washington. Firstly, they wanted to use the fact of the Pentagon nuclear attack as a “convincing tool” (as the author of these lines found out later, after sending the first addition of this book to appropriate specialists) – to convince the U.S. officials in New York to bring down the Twin Towers by claiming that there were two more similar warheads on the upper floors of the Twin Towers, which were allegedly “about to explode”. Secondly – the perpetrators wanted to make sure that Russian President Vladimir Putin would not voice any objections concerning the nuclear demolition of the World Trade Center by its inbuilt emergency nuclear demolition scheme, despite learning of this fact very well from his own intelligence services. The weak point was that President Putin had already declared to the world in August 2000 that in the sunken "Kursk" submarine there weren’t any nuclear weapons. Of course, he could not then take back his noble presidential words and admit that he was only "joking" and that in reality

all the 22 highly sophisticated supersonic "Granit" missiles – each equipped with a 500 kiloton thermonuclear warhead (and also with a pre-loaded list in their guidance systems of the most important NATO targets) – were simply missing.

When confronted with the remains of the "Granit" missile which hit the Pentagon, President Putin was simply forced to shut up in regard to the WTC nuclear demolition, despite the fact that he knew about it very well from reports of his own intelligence. Therefore, instead of voicing his objections, he obediently took the side of the U.S. Government in its so-called "War against Terror".

Supposed leaked video showing missile hitting the Pentagon
Fair Use Notice: This website contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Images on this site are here soley for the purposes of education and research, this constitutes a "fair use" of such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Last updated June, 2014.